Top Message
Top Message
Back to Home Page  |  Recommend a Site  |  Settings   |  Sign In
Education Web
Viewing 1-3 of 3 total results
 Poverty, Old-Age and Social Pensions in Kenya
4 4
9 9
21 21
24 24
41 41
 
Nanak Kakwani, H yun H . Son and Richard H inz 7 countries to strengthen and develop social protection policies and program s in response to econom ic crises and rising vulnerability am ong the elderly (Asian D evelopm ent Bank 2001, W orld Bank 2001, United Nations 2002). ...
1 0
Nanak Kakwani, H yun H . Son and Richard H inz 7 countries to strengthen and develop social protection policies and program s in response to econom ic crises and rising vulnerability am ong the elderly (Asian D evelopm ent Bank 2001, W orld Bank 2001, United Nations 2002). The initial step in assessing an appropriate design and im plem entation path for the potential enhancem ent of the social protection system in Kenya to address the prevalence and consequences of old age poverty is to
3 0 http://www.undp-povertycentre.org/pub/IPCWorkingPaper24.pdf#page=3 www.undp-povertycentre.org/pub/IPCWorkingPaper24.pdf#page=3
POVERTY, OLD-A G E A N D SOCIA L PEN SION S <span class="highlight">IN</span> KEN YA &lowast; Nanak Kakwani,&lowast;&lowast; H yun H . Son&lowast;&lowast; and Richard H inz&lowast;&lowast;&lowast; A BSTRA CT This study is concerned with old-age poverty <span class="highlight">in</span> Kenya. It is also concerned with strengthening and developing social pension program s <span class="highlight">for</span> <span class="highlight">the</span> <span class="highlight">elderly</span>. <span class="highlight">In</span> this study, we develop precise socioeconom ic and dem ographic profiles of <span class="highlight">the</span> <span class="highlight">elderly</span> <span class="highlight">in</span> Kenya from <span class="highlight">the</span> viewpoint of providing policy-m akers with inform ation that m ay be useful <span class="highlight">in</span> <span class="highlight">the</span> reform and expansion of <span class="highlight">the</span>
4 0 http://www.undp-povertycentre.org/pub/IPCWorkingPaper24.pdf#page=4 www.undp-povertycentre.org/pub/IPCWorkingPaper24.pdf#page=4
large, and poverty rates of <span class="highlight">the</span> <span class="highlight">elderly</span> increased between 1994 and 1997, <span class="highlight">the</span> period <span class="highlight">for</span> which there is household survey data available. <span class="highlight">In</span> 1994, 44% of persons over <span class="highlight">the</span> age of 55 reported incom es below <span class="highlight">the</span> official poverty lines com pared to 37% of <span class="highlight">the</span> total population. <span class="highlight">The</span> differential is even greater than these num bers suggest because <span class="highlight">the</span> <span class="highlight">elderly</span> are included <span class="highlight">in</span> <span class="highlight">the</span> overall num bers. <span class="highlight">In</span> 1997, <span class="highlight">the</span> poverty rate <span class="highlight">for</span> <span class="highlight">the</span> <span class="highlight">elderly</span> was nearly 50%, com pared to 45% overall. <span class="highlight">In</span> addition, <span class="highlight">the</span> severity and depth
5 0 http://www.undp-povertycentre.org/pub/IPCWorkingPaper24.pdf#page=5 www.undp-povertycentre.org/pub/IPCWorkingPaper24.pdf#page=5
national incom e would cost about 1% of G D P. Expanding this to 50% of per capita G D P would raise <span class="highlight">the</span> cost proportionally to just above 2% of G D P. This represents a sizable but feasible portion of current tax revenues that are now just above 20% of G D P. If a pension program provided cash transfers to all <span class="highlight">elderly</span> 55 years old and over, there would be about 1.5 and 1.7 m illion beneficiaries <span class="highlight">in</span> 1994 and 1997, respectively. Such a program would have a m ajor im pact on poverty rates and levels <span class="highlight">for</span> <span class="highlight">the</span>
9 0 http://www.undp-povertycentre.org/pub/IPCWorkingPaper24.pdf#page=9 www.undp-povertycentre.org/pub/IPCWorkingPaper24.pdf#page=9
Nanak Kakwani, H yun H . Son and Richard H inz 7 countries to strengthen and develop social protection policies and program s <span class="highlight">in</span> response to econom ic crises and rising vulnerability am ong <span class="highlight">the</span> <span class="highlight">elderly</span> (Asian D evelopm ent Bank 2001, W orld Bank 2001, United Nations 2002). <span class="highlight">The</span> initial step <span class="highlight">in</span> assessing an appropriate design and im plem entation path <span class="highlight">for</span> <span class="highlight">the</span> potential enhancem ent of <span class="highlight">the</span> social protection <span class="highlight">system</span> <span class="highlight">in</span> Kenya to address <span class="highlight">the</span> prevalence and consequences of old age poverty is to
16 0 http://www.undp-povertycentre.org/pub/IPCWorkingPaper24.pdf#page=16 www.undp-povertycentre.org/pub/IPCWorkingPaper24.pdf#page=16
14 International Poverty Centre W orking Paper n&ordm; 24 2.7 PO VERTY SIM ULATIO N <span class="highlight">The</span> study sim ulates several alternative designs of a non-contributory social pension <span class="highlight">system</span> <span class="highlight">for</span> <span class="highlight">the</span> <span class="highlight">elderly</span>. These are intended to illustrate <span class="highlight">the</span> relative effects of alternative program design and associated costs on poverty reduction. O utcom es are estim ated not only <span class="highlight">for</span> <span class="highlight">the</span> <span class="highlight">elderly</span>, but also <span class="highlight">for</span> national poverty. To evaluate <span class="highlight">the</span> potential im pact of a social pension, several alternative designs <span class="highlight">for</span> such a
19 0 http://www.undp-povertycentre.org/pub/IPCWorkingPaper24.pdf#page=19 www.undp-povertycentre.org/pub/IPCWorkingPaper24.pdf#page=19
Nanak Kakwani, H yun H . Son and Richard H inz 17 <span class="highlight">For</span> instance, <span class="highlight">the</span> Central province is dom inated by com m ercial farm ers. This feature of <span class="highlight">the</span> province can be attractive <span class="highlight">for</span> both retirees starting com m ercial farm ing and <span class="highlight">for</span> <span class="highlight">elderly</span> seeking <span class="highlight">for</span> em ploym ent. O n <span class="highlight">the</span> other hand, Nyanza province has a high percentage of subsistence farm ers. Pastoralism is prevalent <span class="highlight">in</span> certain districts <span class="highlight">in</span> <span class="highlight">the</span> Rift Valley, Northeastern and som e parts of <span class="highlight">the</span> Coastal and Eastern provinces. Pastoralist
21 0 http://www.undp-povertycentre.org/pub/IPCWorkingPaper24.pdf#page=21 www.undp-povertycentre.org/pub/IPCWorkingPaper24.pdf#page=21
livelihood opportunities. <span class="highlight">In</span> this context, pensions <span class="highlight">for</span> <span class="highlight">the</span> <span class="highlight">elderly</span> could be of great im portance. Pension incom e is usually likely to be pooled within households, and younger m em bers have been dem onstrated to benefit from it. Table 3.7 illustrates one of <span class="highlight">the</span> m ain effects of <span class="highlight">elderly</span> caring <span class="highlight">for</span> children by exam ining <span class="highlight">the</span> school attendance of children from <span class="highlight">elderly</span> headed households. School-age children are defined as those aged between 6 and 17, which corresponds to <span class="highlight">the</span> current Kenyan education <span class="highlight">system</span>
22 0 http://www.undp-povertycentre.org/pub/IPCWorkingPaper24.pdf#page=22 www.undp-povertycentre.org/pub/IPCWorkingPaper24.pdf#page=22
20 International Poverty Centre W orking Paper n&ordm; 24 children living <span class="highlight">in</span> other households. This suggests that children living <span class="highlight">in</span> <span class="highlight">elderly</span> headed households suffer greater financial hardship compared to those living <span class="highlight">in</span> non-<span class="highlight">elderly</span> ones. &ldquo;O ther&rdquo; as a reason other than <span class="highlight">the</span> specific six reasons, is <span class="highlight">the</span> next highest cause after fees cited by <span class="highlight">the</span> children <span class="highlight">for</span> not com pleting <span class="highlight">the</span> education cycle. <span class="highlight">The</span> children who responded no interest as a reason <span class="highlight">for</span> not attending school is also significant, at 8.8 percent
24 0 http://www.undp-povertycentre.org/pub/IPCWorkingPaper24.pdf#page=24 www.undp-povertycentre.org/pub/IPCWorkingPaper24.pdf#page=24
private dispensaries. <span class="highlight">For</span> those under 60, <span class="highlight">the</span> m ost frequent action when sick is also to visit a pharm acy (74 percent), followed by consulting a dispensary (12.4 percent). Attending a health centre or hospital is m ore com m on <span class="highlight">for</span> <span class="highlight">the</span> non-<span class="highlight">elderly</span> group com pared to <span class="highlight">the</span> <span class="highlight">elderly</span> one. <span class="highlight">The</span> 1994 W M S show s that nationally, 10.16 percent of <span class="highlight">the</span> <span class="highlight">elderly</span> over 60 w ho are sick do not receive treatment. <span class="highlight">The</span> corresponding figure increased to 19.10 percent <span class="highlight">in</span> 1997. <span class="highlight">For</span> <span class="highlight">the</span> w hole population, <span class="highlight">the</span> figures <span class="highlight">for</span> not
29 0 http://www.undp-povertycentre.org/pub/IPCWorkingPaper24.pdf#page=29 www.undp-povertycentre.org/pub/IPCWorkingPaper24.pdf#page=29
Nanak Kakwani, H yun H . Son and Richard H inz 27 FIGURE 4.4 Literacy status of <span class="highlight">elderly</span> pensioners 74.5 25.5 79.1 20.9 74.1 25.9 0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0 100.0 All pensioners Pensioners 55 &amp; over Pensioners 60 &amp; over Literate Illiterate Source: Authors&rsquo; calculations based on <span class="highlight">the</span> 1994 W M S. 4.4 PENSIO NERS LIVING W ITH CH ILD REN <span class="highlight">In</span> Kenya, <span class="highlight">the</span> m ajor roles of older people can be identified as: child care givers <span class="highlight">for</span> em ployed fam ily m em bers with children; and care
30 0 http://www.undp-povertycentre.org/pub/IPCWorkingPaper24.pdf#page=30 www.undp-povertycentre.org/pub/IPCWorkingPaper24.pdf#page=30
<span class="highlight">the</span> asset ownership of those without access to pensions. <span class="highlight">The</span> results reveal that <span class="highlight">elderly</span>-headed households with pensions tend to own large land parcels, and it was observed that m ost households own no land or little land, seriously disadvantaging their ability to earn a livelihood. Land holding is defined as land owned or operated by a household used either <span class="highlight">for</span> crops or livestock rearing. <span class="highlight">In</span> terms of mean land holding size, <span class="highlight">the</span> difference betw een <span class="highlight">the</span> <span class="highlight">elderly</span>-headed households w ith and w ithout
31 0 http://www.undp-povertycentre.org/pub/IPCWorkingPaper24.pdf#page=31 www.undp-povertycentre.org/pub/IPCWorkingPaper24.pdf#page=31
<span class="highlight">in</span> Kenya. <span class="highlight">The</span> <span class="highlight">elderly</span> without pensions tend to have m ore access to cars than their counterpart <span class="highlight">elderly</span>. Radios and TV sets are m ore com m only owned assets com pared to assets like cars. This m ay not only be a reflection of affordability, but also <span class="highlight">the</span> practicalities of daily life. O n average, <span class="highlight">elderly</span> having access to pensions own m ore radios and TV sets than those without pensions. <span class="highlight">In</span> <span class="highlight">the</span> case of life insurance, 2.89 percent of <span class="highlight">the</span> population <span class="highlight">in</span> 1994 had life insurance. O f <span class="highlight">the</span> <span class="highlight">elderly</span>, there is a
32 0 http://www.undp-povertycentre.org/pub/IPCWorkingPaper24.pdf#page=32 www.undp-povertycentre.org/pub/IPCWorkingPaper24.pdf#page=32
pensions, a higher proportion of <span class="highlight">elderly</span>-headed households w ith pensions have access to safe sanitation and electricity. These findings suggest that <span class="highlight">elderly</span>-headed households receiving pensions tend to have a better quality of living standards than those w ithout pensions. O n <span class="highlight">the</span> whole, <span class="highlight">the</span> lim ited pension <span class="highlight">system</span> of Kenya appears to provide a m eaningful source of incom e support <span class="highlight">for</span> <span class="highlight">the</span> sm all proportion of <span class="highlight">elderly</span> persons that receive benefits. Those who report pension receipt indicate far better
33 0 http://www.undp-povertycentre.org/pub/IPCWorkingPaper24.pdf#page=33 www.undp-povertycentre.org/pub/IPCWorkingPaper24.pdf#page=33
current pension <span class="highlight">system</span> <span class="highlight">for</span> form al sector workers, although sm all, is reaching persons within <span class="highlight">the</span> lowest incom e groups. 5.2 PENSIO NS AND TH E PRO BABILITY O F BEING PO O R As a second step <span class="highlight">in</span> identifying <span class="highlight">the</span> im pact of current pension incom e on poverty a probit m odel was developed to evaluate <span class="highlight">the</span> determ inants of <span class="highlight">the</span> probability that a household m em ber living <span class="highlight">in</span> a household headed by an <span class="highlight">elderly</span> person will be poor. A m ultivariate setting enables <span class="highlight">the</span> identification of <span class="highlight">the</span> im pact of having a
38 0 http://www.undp-povertycentre.org/pub/IPCWorkingPaper24.pdf#page=38 www.undp-povertycentre.org/pub/IPCWorkingPaper24.pdf#page=38
This study has also calculated <span class="highlight">the</span> PPP index <span class="highlight">in</span> <span class="highlight">the</span> hypothetical case of a universal pension program <span class="highlight">for</span> <span class="highlight">the</span> <span class="highlight">elderly</span>. Suppose that every <span class="highlight">elderly</span> person over 55 or 60 years old receives a non-contributory pension from <span class="highlight">the</span> governm ent. Is this scenario likely to be m ore pro-poor than <span class="highlight">the</span> actual pension program ? Using both <span class="highlight">the</span> 1994 and 1997 W M S, Table 6.2 attem pts to seek <span class="highlight">the</span> answer to this question. TABLE 6.2 Pro-Poor Policy index <span class="highlight">for</span> universal pensions to <span class="highlight">elderly</span> living <span class="highlight">in</span> rural and urban areas
41 0 http://www.undp-povertycentre.org/pub/IPCWorkingPaper24.pdf#page=41 www.undp-povertycentre.org/pub/IPCWorkingPaper24.pdf#page=41
<span class="highlight">in</span> Table 6.4. If a pension program had been designed to reach <span class="highlight">elderly</span> 55 years old and over, there would have been m ore than 1.5 and 1.7 m illion beneficiaries <span class="highlight">in</span> 1994 and 1997, respectively. O f those, 93-94 percent cam e from rural areas <span class="highlight">in</span> that period. If <span class="highlight">the</span> coverage of <span class="highlight">the</span> pension program was reduced, <span class="highlight">the</span> num ber of beneficiaries would be expected to <span class="highlight">fall</span>. This is <span class="highlight">the</span> case <span class="highlight">for</span> a pension schem e, if designed <span class="highlight">for</span> those older than 60. <span class="highlight">In</span> com puting pensions given to each beneficiary, we should
42 0 http://www.undp-povertycentre.org/pub/IPCWorkingPaper24.pdf#page=42 www.undp-povertycentre.org/pub/IPCWorkingPaper24.pdf#page=42
pensions. <span class="highlight">The</span> results show that such a universal pension schem e would have cost 1.16 and 1.38 percent of G D P <span class="highlight">in</span> 1994 and 1997, respectively. As expected, when eligibility is reduced to <span class="highlight">elderly</span> over 60, costs <span class="highlight">fall</span> to less than 1 percent of G D P per capita <span class="highlight">in</span> both periods. <span class="highlight">For</span> com parison, <span class="highlight">in</span> India, <span class="highlight">the</span> total expenditure on various safety net program s including old age pensions am ounted to 1.5 &ndash; 2 percent of G D P. Brazil, Nam ibia and South Africa spend 1, 2, and 1.4 percent of G D P, respectively, on
44 0 http://www.undp-povertycentre.org/pub/IPCWorkingPaper24.pdf#page=44 www.undp-povertycentre.org/pub/IPCWorkingPaper24.pdf#page=44
42 International Poverty Centre W orking Paper n&ordm; 24 show s, a given level of pension w ould have a more significant impact on poor individuals living far below <span class="highlight">the</span> poverty threshold rather than those clustered around <span class="highlight">the</span> threshold. This point is further highlighted w hen it comes to poverty among <span class="highlight">elderly</span>. Finally, as expected, <span class="highlight">the</span> pension transfer leads to substantial reduction <span class="highlight">in</span> poverty among <span class="highlight">elderly</span> and also <span class="highlight">in</span> non-negligible poverty reduction <span class="highlight">for</span> children under 15 (at <span class="highlight">the</span> national level
45 0 http://www.undp-povertycentre.org/pub/IPCWorkingPaper24.pdf#page=45 www.undp-povertycentre.org/pub/IPCWorkingPaper24.pdf#page=45
provides som e prelim inary assessm ent of several key issues that should be included <span class="highlight">in</span> <span class="highlight">the</span> consideration of approaches to expand and reform <span class="highlight">the</span> pension <span class="highlight">system</span> . <span class="highlight">The</span> policy analysis is prim arily directed at evaluating <span class="highlight">the</span> costs, design and projected outcom es of providing a universal &ldquo;dem ogrant&rdquo; type social pension that would provide basic subsistence benefits to citizens reaching a specified retirem ent age. This review of <span class="highlight">the</span> status of <span class="highlight">the</span> <span class="highlight">elderly</span> <span class="highlight">in</span> Kenya indicates a pressing need <span class="highlight">for</span> som e expansion
46 0 http://www.undp-povertycentre.org/pub/IPCWorkingPaper24.pdf#page=46 www.undp-povertycentre.org/pub/IPCWorkingPaper24.pdf#page=46
<span class="highlight">the</span> poverty line com pared to 45% of all children. Children <span class="highlight">in</span> <span class="highlight">the</span> care of <span class="highlight">the</span> <span class="highlight">elderly</span> indicate m uch lower rates of school attendance. D espite <span class="highlight">the</span> greater risk and associated social consequences of <span class="highlight">the</span> low econom ic status of <span class="highlight">the</span> <span class="highlight">elderly</span>, <span class="highlight">the</span> form al pension <span class="highlight">system</span> <span class="highlight">in</span> Kenya rem ains very lim ited. O nly 3.1% of people over <span class="highlight">the</span> age of 55 <span class="highlight">in</span> 1994 reported <span class="highlight">the</span> receipt of any pension incom e and 90% of these recipients were m ale. <span class="highlight">The</span> lim ited data precludes any ability to determ ine patterns <span class="highlight">for</span> <span class="highlight">the</span>
47 0 http://www.undp-povertycentre.org/pub/IPCWorkingPaper24.pdf#page=47 www.undp-povertycentre.org/pub/IPCWorkingPaper24.pdf#page=47
Nanak Kakwani, H yun H . Son and Richard H inz 45 <span class="highlight">The</span> analysis also suggests that due to <span class="highlight">the</span> prevalence of poverty am ong <span class="highlight">the</span> <span class="highlight">elderly</span>, there will be lim ited gains from m eans testing such a <span class="highlight">system</span> relative to providing benefits <span class="highlight">for</span> all at a specified age. Several of <span class="highlight">the</span> m ain design param eters of such a <span class="highlight">system</span> can be considered <span class="highlight">in</span> <span class="highlight">the</span> context of basic inform ation on incom e distribution and poverty levels derived from <span class="highlight">the</span> household data. <span class="highlight">The</span> key threshold question of affordability can be
 Ageing and poverty in africa and the role of social pensions
1.7 -6.7 -2.2 Kenya -3.0 -2.4 -15.3 -2.8 Madagascar -3.4 -3.0 -26.4 -2.9 Mozambique -1.5 -1.3 -8.9 -1.3 Malawi -1.5 -1.3 -9.5 -1.5 Nigeria -3.1 -2.5 -14.0 -2.7 Uganda -3.3 -2.7 -14.1 -2.5 The simulations also assume that the pension, though delivered to the elderly pe...
1 0
1.7 -6.7 -2.2 Kenya -3.0 -2.4 -15.3 -2.8 Madagascar -3.4 -3.0 -26.4 -2.9 Mozambique -1.5 -1.3 -8.9 -1.3 Malawi -1.5 -1.3 -9.5 -1.5 Nigeria -3.1 -2.5 -14.0 -2.7 Uganda -3.3 -2.7 -14.1 -2.5 The simulations also assume that the pension, though delivered to the elderly person, is shared within the household – a realistic assumption in the African context. The poverty reduction impacts of targeting to all elderly persons, all poor elderly persons, are shown in Table 10 (for head count poverty) and
23 0 http://www.undp-povertycentre.org/pub/IPCWorkingPaper8.pdf#page=23 www.undp-povertycentre.org/pub/IPCWorkingPaper8.pdf#page=23
1.7 -6.7 -2.2 Kenya -3.0 -2.4 -15.3 -2.8 Madagascar -3.4 -3.0 -26.4 -2.9 Mozambique -1.5 -1.3 -8.9 -1.3 Malawi -1.5 -1.3 -9.5 -1.5 Nigeria -3.1 -2.5 -14.0 -2.7 Uganda -3.3 -2.7 -14.1 -2.5 <span class="highlight">The</span> simulations also assume that <span class="highlight">the</span> pension, though delivered to <span class="highlight">the</span> <span class="highlight">elderly</span> person, is shared within <span class="highlight">the</span> household &ndash; a realistic assumption <span class="highlight">in</span> <span class="highlight">the</span> African context. <span class="highlight">The</span> poverty reduction impacts of targeting to all <span class="highlight">elderly</span> persons, all poor <span class="highlight">elderly</span> persons, are shown <span class="highlight">in</span> Table 10 (<span class="highlight">for</span> head count poverty) and
 Old-Age Poverty and Social Pensions in Kenya
increased between 1994 and 1997 (the period for which there are household survey data available). These poverty rates have various secondary consequences. There is a high rate of grandparents caring for children because of the HIV/AIDS epidemic. This exposes children to ...
1 0
increased between 1994 and 1997 (the period for which there are household survey data available). These poverty rates have various secondary consequences. There is a high rate of grandparents caring for children because of the HIV/AIDS epidemic. This exposes children to the consequences of old age poverty. A higher proportion of children living in elderly headed households are poorer than for the average. Also, children living in these households have lower rates of school attendance than others. The current
1 0 http://www.undp-povertycentre.org/pub/IPCOnePager25.pdf#page=1 www.undp-povertycentre.org/pub/IPCOnePager25.pdf#page=1
increased between 1994 and 1997 (<span class="highlight">the</span> period <span class="highlight">for</span> which there are household survey data available). These poverty rates have various secondary consequences. There is a high rate of grandparents caring <span class="highlight">for</span> children because of <span class="highlight">the</span> HIV/AIDS epidemic. This exposes children to <span class="highlight">the</span> consequences of old age poverty. A higher proportion of children living <span class="highlight">in</span> <span class="highlight">elderly</span> headed households are poorer than <span class="highlight">for</span> <span class="highlight">the</span> average. Also, children living <span class="highlight">in</span> these households have lower rates of school attendance than others. <span class="highlight">The</span> current