|
Education
Web
Heat Transfer and El Ni�o
one reason why. 2. Record your predictions and reasons on the back of your SST data table paper. STEP THREE 1. Now it's time to do a little reading. The following is a basic article from USA Today about El Niño. Click on the link and read. Pay close attention to paragraphs three an...
 K-1
Fibers Technology Group, Weyerhauser Brian MacNevin, North Cascades and Olympic Science Partnership, Bellingham School District Dr. Judy Morrison, Washington State University TriCities Dr. George (Pinky) Nelson, Western Washington University Kimberly Olson, Tacoma School District Steve Olson, Nine M...
1
0
Fibers Technology Group, Weyerhauser Brian MacNevin, North Cascades and Olympic Science Partnership, Bellingham School District Dr. Judy Morrison, Washington State University TriCities Dr. George (Pinky) Nelson, Western Washington University Kimberly Olson, Tacoma School District Steve Olson, Nine Mile Falls School District Ethan Smith, Tahoma School District Barbara Taylor, Othello School District Kristen White, Evergreen School District Facilitators for Public Review Center for Strengthening
111
0
http://www.k12.wa.us/CurriculumInstruct/Science/pubdocs/WAScienceStandardsFINAL.pdf#page=111
www.k12.wa.us/CurriculumInstruct/Science/pubdocs/WAScienceStandardsFINAL....
Fibers Technology Group, Weyerhauser Brian MacNevin, North Cascades and Olympic Science Partnership, Bellingham School District Dr. Judy Morrison, Washington State University TriCities Dr. George (Pinky) Nelson, Western Washington University Kimberly Olson, Tacoma School District Steve Olson, Nine Mile Falls School District Ethan Smith, Tahoma School District Barbara Taylor, Othello School District Kristen White, Evergreen School District Facilitators for Public <span class="highlight">Review</span> Center for Strengthening
Microsoft Word - sci_std_Aug07_intro.docsci_std_Aug07_intro.pdf
vii As part of the federal reauthorized 2002 Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), known as “No Child Left Behind’ and as part of the state’s requirement to review curriculum standard every three years, at the April, 2004 meeting of the Kansas State Board of Educati...
1
0
vii As part of the federal reauthorized 2002 Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), known as “No Child Left Behind’ and as part of the state’s requirement to review curriculum standard every three years, at the April, 2004 meeting of the Kansas State Board of Education, the Board directed that academic standards committees should be convened and charge to: • Review the current science standards as well as national and other state standards in light of what students should know and be able to
1
0
http://www.ksde.org/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=yBCIHNkZFsU%3d&tabid=144&mid=8019&forcedownload=true#page=7
www.ksde.org/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=yBCIHNkZFsU%3d&tabid=144&mid=8019&...
vii As part of the federal reauthorized 2002 Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), known as “No Child Left Behind’ and as part of the state’s requirement to <span class="highlight">review</span> curriculum standard every three years, at the April, 2004 meeting of the Kansas State Board of Education, the Board directed that academic standards committees should be convened and charge to: • <span class="highlight">Review</span> the current science standards as well as national and other state standards in light of what students should know and be able to
Microsoft Word - sci_standards_Aug07b.docsci_standards_Aug07b.pdf
vii As part of the federal reauthorized 2002 Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), known as “No Child Left Behind’ and as part of the state’s requirement to review curriculum standard every three years, at the April, 2004 meeting of the Kansas State Board of Educati...
1
0
vii As part of the federal reauthorized 2002 Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), known as “No Child Left Behind’ and as part of the state’s requirement to review curriculum standard every three years, at the April, 2004 meeting of the Kansas State Board of Education, the Board directed that academic standards committees should be convened and charge to: • Review the current science standards as well as national and other state standards in light of what students should know and be able to
1
0
http://www.ksde.org/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=YgH0PnTTzS4%3d&tabid=144&mid=8019&forcedownload=true#page=7
www.ksde.org/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=YgH0PnTTzS4%3d&tabid=144&mid=8019&...
vii As part of the federal reauthorized 2002 Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), known as “No Child Left Behind’ and as part of the state’s requirement to <span class="highlight">review</span> curriculum standard every three years, at the April, 2004 meeting of the Kansas State Board of Education, the Board directed that academic standards committees should be convened and charge to: • <span class="highlight">Review</span> the current science standards as well as national and other state standards in light of what students should know and be able to
Science
36 Chemistry: Nature of Science Science Framework Revision 2005 Arkansas Department of Education Key: NS.34.C.1 = Nature of Science. Standard 34. Chemistry. 1 st Student Learning Expectation Strand: Nature of Science Standard 34: Students shall demonstrate an understanding of the current theories...
1
0
36 Chemistry: Nature of Science Science Framework Revision 2005 Arkansas Department of Education Key: NS.34.C.1 = Nature of Science. Standard 34. Chemistry. 1 st Student Learning Expectation Strand: Nature of Science Standard 34: Students shall demonstrate an understanding of the current theories in chemistry. NS.34.C.1 Recognize that theories are scientific explanations that require empirical data, verification, and peer review NS.34.C.2 Understand that scientific
37
0
http://arkansased.org/teachers/pdf/chemistry_9-12_2005_060508.pdf#page=37
arkansased.org/teachers/pdf/chemistry_9-12_2005_060508.pdf#page=37
36 Chemistry: Nature of Science Science Framework Revision 2005 Arkansas Department of Education Key: NS.34.C.1 = Nature of Science. Standard 34. Chemistry. 1 st Student Learning Expectation Strand: Nature of Science Standard 34: Students shall demonstrate an understanding of the current theories in chemistry. NS.34.C.1 Recognize that theories are scientific explanations that require empirical data, verification, and peer <span class="highlight">review</span> NS.34.C.2 Understand that scientific
WYOMING LANGUAGE ARTS
http://www.doe.state.in.us. • New Jersey – Science Standards • Virginia – Science Standards of Learning, http://www.pen.k12.va.us. In 2002-2003, writing committees were convened to review and revise these standards. In 2008, consistent with its responsibility to evalu...
1
0
http://www.doe.state.in.us. • New Jersey – Science Standards • Virginia – Science Standards of Learning, http://www.pen.k12.va.us. In 2002-2003, writing committees were convened to review and revise these standards. In 2008, consistent with its responsibility to evaluate and review the uniformity and quality of the standards at least every five years, the Wyoming State Board of Education Board directed the Wyoming Department of Education (WDE), working in consultation and coordination with local
3
0
http://www.k12.wy.us/SA/standards/Standards%202008%20Science.pdf#page=3
www.k12.wy.us/SA/standards/Standards%202008%20Science.pdf#page=3
communities, and the state. This must be an ongoing political dialogue that begins with our <span class="highlight">review</span> of the Wyoming State Standards but must not end there. In accordance with Wyoming State Statute 21-2-304 (a) (iii) the State Board of Education (Board) in consultation and coordination with local school districts (LEA) will “prescribe uniform student content and performance standards for the common core of knowledge and the common core of skills specified under W.S. 21-9-101(b). . . .” Under W.S. 21-2-304(c
8
0
http://www.k12.wy.us/SA/standards/Standards%202008%20Science.pdf#page=8
www.k12.wy.us/SA/standards/Standards%202008%20Science.pdf#page=8
http://www.doe.state.in.us. • New Jersey – Science Standards • Virginia – Science Standards of Learning, http://www.pen.k12.va.us. In 2002-2003, writing committees were convened to <span class="highlight">review</span> and revise these standards. In 2008, consistent with its responsibility to evaluate and <span class="highlight">review</span> the uniformity and quality of the standards at least every five years, the Wyoming State Board of Education Board directed the Wyoming Department of Education (WDE), working in consultation and coordination with local
2006 Science and Technology/Engineering Curriculum Framework
Appendix VI Curriculum Review Resources Several organizations have conducted textbook and/or curricular reviews of a range of materials available for science and technology/engineering classrooms. Each organization generally uses a consistent rubric in their review to highlight the fe...
1
0
Appendix VI Curriculum Review Resources Several organizations have conducted textbook and/or curricular reviews of a range of materials available for science and technology/engineering classrooms. Each organization generally uses a consistent rubric in their review to highlight the features and design of each text or curriculum. Below are links to two organizations that have completed reviews of science texts and/or curricula. Education Development Center, Inc. (EDC) Curriculum Profiles http
149
0
http://www.doe.mass.edu/frameworks/scitech/1006.pdf#page=149
www.doe.mass.edu/frameworks/scitech/1006.pdf#page=149
Appendix VI Curriculum <span class="highlight">Review</span> Resources Several organizations have conducted textbook and/or curricular reviews of a range of materials available for science and technology/engineering classrooms. Each organization generally uses a consistent rubric in their <span class="highlight">review</span> to highlight the features and design of each text or curriculum. Below are links to two organizations that have completed reviews of science texts and/or curricula. Education Development Center, Inc. (EDC) Curriculum Profiles http
science_pub2003
Vermont Department of Education (Science Grade Expectations) S52 Grades 5-6 Grades 7-8 Physical Science: Vermont Standards and Evidences—Energy 7.12 e, ee, eee, f, ff, fff; Magnetism 7.12 e, ee, eee, f, ff, fff Energy and Energy Transformation No S7-8:26 at this grade level. Teachers may r...
1
0
Vermont Department of Education (Science Grade Expectations) S52 Grades 5-6 Grades 7-8 Physical Science: Vermont Standards and Evidences—Energy 7.12 e, ee, eee, f, ff, fff; Magnetism 7.12 e, ee, eee, f, ff, fff Energy and Energy Transformation No S7-8:26 at this grade level. Teachers may review Grade 5-6 Electromagnetic Forces Concepts. No S7-8:27 at this grade level Teachers may review Grade 5-6 Electromagnetic Forces Concepts. Energy and Energy Transformation S5-6:26
53
0
http://education.vermont.gov/new/pdfdoc/pubs/grade_expectations/science.pdf#page=53
education.vermont.gov/new/pdfdoc/pubs/grade_expectations/science.pdf#page...
Vermont Department of Education (Science Grade Expectations) S52 Grades 5-6 Grades 7-8 Physical Science: Vermont Standards and Evidences—Energy 7.12 e, ee, eee, f, ff, fff; Magnetism 7.12 e, ee, eee, f, ff, fff Energy and Energy Transformation No S7-8:26 at this grade level. Teachers may <span class="highlight">review</span> Grade 5-6 Electromagnetic Forces Concepts. No S7-8:27 at this grade level Teachers may <span class="highlight">review</span> Grade 5-6 Electromagnetic Forces Concepts. Energy and Energy Transformation S5-6:26
Microsoft Word - science.doc
of the significant details of observations based on simple investigations. Students record some of the significant details of observations based on simple investigations. Students record few of the details of observations based on simple investigations. Grade 4 ABILITIES NECESSARY TO DO SCIENTIF...
1
0
of the significant details of observations based on simple investigations. Students record some of the significant details of observations based on simple investigations. Students record few of the details of observations based on simple investigations. Grade 4 ABILITIES NECESSARY TO DO SCIENTIFIC INQUIRY 4.2.1. Review and ask questions about the scientific investigations of others Students review and ask insightful questions about the scientific investigations of others
22
0
http://www.dpi.state.nd.us/standard/content/science/science.pdf#page=22
www.dpi.state.nd.us/standard/content/science/science.pdf#page=22
of the significant details of observations based on simple investigations. Students record some of the significant details of observations based on simple investigations. Students record few of the details of observations based on simple investigations. Grade 4 ABILITIES NECESSARY TO DO SCIENTIFIC INQUIRY 4.2.1. <span class="highlight">Review</span> and ask questions about the scientific investigations of others Students <span class="highlight">review</span> and ask insightful questions about the scientific investigations of others
STANDARDS.05
70 PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (Grade Level Expectations) 71PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (Grade Level Expectations) GRADE 3 GRADE 4 GRADE 5 GRADE 6 WRITING GRADES 3—6 The student revises writing by [6] 2.4.1 Rearranging and/or adding details to improve focus, to support main ideas, to clarify topic sentenc...
1
0
70 PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (Grade Level Expectations) 71PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (Grade Level Expectations) GRADE 3 GRADE 4 GRADE 5 GRADE 6 WRITING GRADES 3—6 The student revises writing by [6] 2.4.1 Rearranging and/or adding details to improve focus, to support main ideas, to clarify topic sentence, and to make sequence clear [6] 2.4.2 Giving/receiving appropriate feedback and using established criteria to review own and others’ written work (e.g., peer conferences, checklists, scoring guides, or
72
0
http://www.eed.state.ak.us/standards/pdf/standards.pdf#page=72
www.eed.state.ak.us/standards/pdf/standards.pdf#page=72
70 PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (Grade Level Expectations) 71PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (Grade Level Expectations) GRADE 3 GRADE 4 GRADE 5 GRADE 6 WRITING GRADES 3—6 The student revises writing by [6] 2.4.1 Rearranging and/or adding details to improve focus, to support main ideas, to clarify topic sentence, and to make sequence clear [6] 2.4.2 Giving/receiving appropriate feedback and using established criteria to <span class="highlight">review</span> own and others’ written work (e.g., peer conferences, checklists, scoring guides, or
|
