Education
Web
Viewing 1-2 of 2 total results
null
sufficiency of evidence used to support or oppose an argument. #0;3 3003.5.5 Identify established methods (e.g., scientific, historical) used to distinguish between factual claims and opinions. #0;3 3003.5.6 Distinguish between evidence which is directly stated and evidence which is implied...
1
0
sufficiency of evidence used to support or oppose an argument. #0;3 3003.5.5 Identify established methods (e.g., scientific, historical) used to distinguish between factual claims and opinions. #0;3 3003.5.6 Distinguish between evidence which is directly stated and evidence which is implied within an argument. #0;3 3003.5.7 Identify false premises and explain the role they play in argumentation. #0;3 3003.5.8 Analyze common logical fallacies (e.g., appeal to fear, personal attack {ad hominem
13
0
http://www.state.tn.us/education/ci/english/doc/ENG_3003.pdf#page=13
www.state.tn.us/education/ci/english/doc/ENG_3003.pdf#page=13
sufficiency <span class="highlight">of</span> evidence used to support or oppose an argument. #0;3 3003.5.5 Identify established methods (e.g., scientific, historical) used to distinguish between factual claims and opinions. #0;3 3003.5.6 Distinguish between evidence which is directly stated and evidence which is implied within an argument. #0;3 3003.5.7 Identify false premises and explain the role they play <span class="highlight">in</span> argumentation. #0;3 3003.5.8 Analyze common logical fallacies (e.g., appeal to fear, personal attack {<span class="highlight">ad</span> hominem
null
sufficiency of evidence used to support or oppose an argument. #0;3 3005.5.5 Identify established methods (e.g., scientific, historical) used to distinguish between factual claims and opinions. #0;3 3005.5.6 Distinguish between evidence which is directly stated and evidence which is implied...
1
0
sufficiency of evidence used to support or oppose an argument. #0;3 3005.5.5 Identify established methods (e.g., scientific, historical) used to distinguish between factual claims and opinions. #0;3 3005.5.6 Distinguish between evidence which is directly stated and evidence which is implied within an argument. #0;3 3005.5.7 Identify false premises and explain the role they play in argumentation. #0;3 3005.5.8 Analyze common logical fallacies (e.g., appeal to fear, personal attack {ad hominem
11
0
http://www.state.tn.us/education/ci/english/doc/ENG_3005.pdf#page=11
www.state.tn.us/education/ci/english/doc/ENG_3005.pdf#page=11
sufficiency <span class="highlight">of</span> evidence used to support or oppose an argument. #0;3 3005.5.5 Identify established methods (e.g., scientific, historical) used to distinguish between factual claims and opinions. #0;3 3005.5.6 Distinguish between evidence which is directly stated and evidence which is implied within an argument. #0;3 3005.5.7 Identify false premises and explain the role they play <span class="highlight">in</span> argumentation. #0;3 3005.5.8 Analyze common logical fallacies (e.g., appeal to fear, personal attack {<span class="highlight">ad</span> hominem
|
iSEEK provides users with a Favorites library that allows them easy access to their most-used websites from any computer. If you have an iSEEK account, the content you just selected can be added to your Favorites page to be revisited any time you want.
If you would like to join the iSEEK community, click the "Register" button below to create your free iSEEK account. The resource you have selected will be added to your new Favorites library after you sign in for the first time.
If you already have an iSEEK account, click the button below to sign in and add the resource to your Favorites library.