|
Education
Web
Viewing 1-7 of 7 total results
Logic and Argument
Evidence So how do you create an argument with solid premises? You review your evidence, making sure that it is fair, objective, and complete. Ask yourself the following questions about the evidence in your paper. Have you suppressed any facts? The opponent's point of view...
Purdue OWL 2004: Argumentative Writing: Fallacies Handout
necessities and emergencies, or better community planning to discourage daily driving. Ad hominem: This is an attack on the character of a person rather than her/his opinions or arguments. Example: Green Peace's strategies aren't effective because they are all dirty, lazy hippies....
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: informal
determining whether an argument is persuasive or not. In keeping with this, an ad hominem argument may be understood as an attack on the ethos of an arguer which is in principle acceptable. This does not mean that every ad hominem is acceptable, but only those whic...
Using Rhetorical Strategies for Persuasion
This is an attack on the character of a person rather than their opinions or arguments. Example: Green Peace's strategies aren't effective because they are all dirty, lazy hippies. In this example the author doesn't even name particular strategies Green Peace has suggested, much less...
 null
sufficiency of evidence used to support or oppose an argument. #0;3 3003.5.5 Identify established methods (e.g., scientific, historical) used to distinguish between factual claims and opinions. #0;3 3003.5.6 Distinguish between evidence which is directly stated and evidence which is implied...
1
0
sufficiency of evidence used to support or oppose an argument. #0;3 3003.5.5 Identify established methods (e.g., scientific, historical) used to distinguish between factual claims and opinions. #0;3 3003.5.6 Distinguish between evidence which is directly stated and evidence which is implied within an argument. #0;3 3003.5.7 Identify false premises and explain the role they play in argumentation. #0;3 3003.5.8 Analyze common logical fallacies (e.g., appeal to fear, personal attack {ad hominem
13
0
http://www.state.tn.us/education/ci/english/doc/ENG_3003.pdf#page=13
www.state.tn.us/education/ci/english/doc/ENG_3003.pdf#page=13
sufficiency <span class="highlight">of</span> evidence used to support or oppose an argument. #0;3 3003.5.5 Identify established methods (e.g., scientific, historical) used to distinguish between factual claims and opinions. #0;3 3003.5.6 Distinguish between evidence which is directly stated and evidence which is implied within an argument. #0;3 3003.5.7 Identify false premises and explain the role they play <span class="highlight">in</span> argumentation. #0;3 3003.5.8 Analyze common logical fallacies (e.g., appeal to fear, personal attack {<span class="highlight">ad</span> hominem
null
sufficiency of evidence used to support or oppose an argument. #0;3 3005.5.5 Identify established methods (e.g., scientific, historical) used to distinguish between factual claims and opinions. #0;3 3005.5.6 Distinguish between evidence which is directly stated and evidence which is implied...
1
0
sufficiency of evidence used to support or oppose an argument. #0;3 3005.5.5 Identify established methods (e.g., scientific, historical) used to distinguish between factual claims and opinions. #0;3 3005.5.6 Distinguish between evidence which is directly stated and evidence which is implied within an argument. #0;3 3005.5.7 Identify false premises and explain the role they play in argumentation. #0;3 3005.5.8 Analyze common logical fallacies (e.g., appeal to fear, personal attack {ad hominem
11
0
http://www.state.tn.us/education/ci/english/doc/ENG_3005.pdf#page=11
www.state.tn.us/education/ci/english/doc/ENG_3005.pdf#page=11
sufficiency <span class="highlight">of</span> evidence used to support or oppose an argument. #0;3 3005.5.5 Identify established methods (e.g., scientific, historical) used to distinguish between factual claims and opinions. #0;3 3005.5.6 Distinguish between evidence which is directly stated and evidence which is implied within an argument. #0;3 3005.5.7 Identify false premises and explain the role they play <span class="highlight">in</span> argumentation. #0;3 3005.5.8 Analyze common logical fallacies (e.g., appeal to fear, personal attack {<span class="highlight">ad</span> hominem
English Language Arts Content Standards - Curriculum Frameworks (CA Dept of Education)
GLOSSARY appeal to pathos (pity) appositive archetypal criticism archetype attack ad hominem bandwagon base word blend boundary climax clustering complement A common fallacy in arguments, the ad misericordiam approach is a special case of the appeal to emotion in...
1
0
GLOSSARY appeal to pathos (pity) appositive archetypal criticism archetype attack ad hominem bandwagon base word blend boundary climax clustering complement A common fallacy in arguments, the ad misericordiam approach is a special case of the appeal to emotion in which the altruism and mercy of the audience are the special emotions to which the speaker appeals. A word or phrase that restates or modifies an immediately preceding noun. Note: An appositive is often useful as a context clue
85
0
http://www.cde.ca.gov/be/st/ss/documents/elacontentstnds.pdf#page=85
www.cde.ca.gov/be/st/ss/documents/elacontentstnds.pdf#page=85
GLOSSARY appeal to pathos (pity) appositive archetypal criticism archetype attack <span class="highlight">ad</span> hominem bandwagon base word blend boundary climax clustering complement A common fallacy <span class="highlight">in</span> arguments, the <span class="highlight">ad</span> misericordiam approach is a special case <span class="highlight">of</span> the appeal to emotion <span class="highlight">in</span> which the altruism and mercy <span class="highlight">of</span> the audience are the special emotions to which the speaker appeals. A word or phrase that restates or modifies an immediately preceding noun. Note: An appositive is often useful as a context clue
|
